Search

    Select Website Language

    GDPR Compliance

    We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

    Why don't they build a supercar you can use in the real world?

    5 days ago

    12

    0

    👍 ❤️ 😂 😮 😢 😡

    Eek, graunch, oops, sorry. There will be a set of exclamations, crunches and apologies such as these if I'm driving a car that grinds its nose on a driveway ramp or speed bump or grounds out over an undulating road.I apologise because I feel like I've let the car down. Yet, as time goes by, I'm less and less convinced that it's my fault.So why the apology? Is it a natural part of being English? Like saying sorry to someone who happens to be wanting to walk through a door at the same time as me? Oops, my bad. Or like feeling similarly in restaurants when not everything will fit on a table?Oh dear, what a muddle, let me move my drink and that little vase with the artificial flower in it-sorry-so there's room for the saag aloo.How many times have I apologised like this over the years? Dozens, certainly. Hundreds, maybe. And I think I've had enough of it.Not one of those times was I responsible for how low a car was or how small a restaurant table was. So why on earth was I apologising? Car makers know what the roads are like, just as restaurateurs know exactly how much their average customer is likely to order.So, genuinely reluctant though I am to criticise a hospitality industry that needs all the help it can get, how about making the tables a tiny bit bigger?And, more pertinently to my day job, why make road cars that can't be driven onto driveways, into car parks or over shoddy roads without significant risk of underbody gravel rash or, worse, cracked splitters or diffusers? Give it a rest; ease off the downforce a bit and give them more ground clearance, for heaven's sake.Manufacturers may argue that they fit hydraulic nose lifters to avoid this sort of damage. And it's true that any time I get into a car that has a button that raises the front end clear of harshly angled driveways, I am, for a brief moment, grateful.Yet then I'm also fearful. For one, exactly how low is this car? For two, how long will that nose lift take to actually raise? And at what speed will it happen? Some are painfully slow or will refuse until the car is moving at a crawl. Smart #5 7 Smart #5 Kia PV5 8 Kia PV5 Ford Puma Gen-E 8 Ford Puma Gen-E Ferrari 849 Testarossa Ferrari 849 Testarossa Volkswagen Golf GTI Edition 50 Volkswagen Golf GTI Edition 50 View all car reviewsFinally, though, I'm irked that, through fitting a lifting nose, the manufacturer has somehow passed the onus of not scratching the underside of this car on to me, rather than itself and the highway constructor bearing the responsibility themselves, where it actually lies.Approaching an abrupt ramp or speed bump, there might be traffic impatiently queuing up behind me, or I might have misjudged the severity of the angle, and it's not like I'm outside the car, able to check whether I have clearance.So I'm very much taking a punt. Yet if I get it wrong, I feel doubly responsible, because I didn't raise the car's nose enough or in time. This is unfair. And I've had enough of being sorry for it. This isn't my fault.If a manufacturer wants to design a car with a low front splitter and rear diffuser to improve aerodynamics, it should at least make the splitter out of some kind of flexible rubber (as Porsche tends to) so that if it graunches, it doesn't matter.But better still would be to make a car fit for the roads where it will be driven. That means no dangling splitter or trailing diffuser or ground clearance so low that the car's mid-section whumps into the ground alarmingly over a poor back road-because Britain has loads of those.This is not, I should say, the world's most serious issue for me. But I can't believe I'm the only one who thinks like this, and I do believe it's a significant turn-off for potential buyers.This is entirely anecdotal evidence, I know, but I have many mates who say they're not interested in the latest supercars because they're just too fast, too wide, too low, too silly: not usable enough on the road.A number of factors are at play there, but designing a car that doesn't grind its underside would genuinely be a solid starting point for improving the situation.Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.Matt is Autocar’s lead features writer and presenter, is the main face of Autocar’s YouTube channel, presents the My Week In Cars podcast and has written his weekly column, Tester’s Notes, since 2013.Matt is an automotive engineer who has been writing and talking about cars since 1997. He joined Autocar in 2005 as deputy road test editor, prior to which he was road test editor and world rally editor for Channel 4’s automotive website, 4Car. Into all things engineering and automotive from any era, Matt is as comfortable regularly contributing to sibling titles Move Electric and Classic & Sports Car as he is writing for Autocar. He has a racing licence, and some malfunctioning classic cars and motorbikes. Manufacturers have addressed this problem - high performance SUVs are the result. Careful what you wish for... Though if you want to call out manufacturers for making impractical cars, how about oversized wheels and rubber band tyres?Cars like the Wells Vertige could be a perfect balance between passion and usability. Much more enjoyable than supercars and hypercars that feel more like show-offs than vehicles to drive.Matt. I do find that I agree with so many of your observations. I think we are of similar opinions.There is nothing Supercar about having to constantly stop to pass oncoming traffic because the car is too low or too wide. This is NOT fun. Nothing supercar about not being able to cross speed bumps or negotiate a drive way.Watching supercars in Monaco or Knightsbridge is a sad indictment of what modern supercars have become...bejeweled posing pouches constrained by 20 mph speed limits, and franxly unable to cope with their surroundings - resembling floundering beached whales, with the turning circle of a super tanker, hopeless visibility, and not able to fit in marked parking bay, for fear of savaging expensive alloys!Its not a good look, and it doesnt incite the dream of ownership in me.I suppose a 911 Dakar gets closest to usable in the UK (even that is way too wide). They should all come with a government warning - "Not suitable for public roads"  Smart #5 7 Smart #5 Kia PV5 8 Kia PV5 Ford Puma Gen-E 8 Ford Puma Gen-E Ferrari 849 Testarossa Ferrari 849 Testarossa Volkswagen Golf GTI Edition 50 Volkswagen Golf GTI Edition 50 View all car reviews
    Click here to Read More
    • Share:
    Inside the British factory still making 1930s supercars
    Previous Article
    Inside the British factory still making 1930s supercars
    Next Article
    Eco-campaigners' fury over 4x4 drivers 'ripping up' protected chalk stream by using it as a 'fun splash route'
    Eco-campaigners' fury over 4x4 drivers 'ripping up' protected chalk stream by using it as a 'fun splash route'

    Related Reviews Updates:

    Are you sure? You want to delete this comment..! Remove Cancel

    Comments (0)

      Leave a comment

      Send